The importance of engaging the right

I wonder if the gunman who went on a shooting spree at the two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand would have done what he did if the conservatives were engaged and felt part of the larger society in New Zealand’s political system.

The gunman is said to be an ultra-conservative person. No decent person whatever your political leanings or religion will commit the kind of crime he did. It was a lone attack and an evil crime and, frankly, no different from all the other terrorist attacks on communities of other faiths and nationalities.

But, would this gunman have been emboldened to commit such a hate crime if the far right conservatives were regarded as part of society rather than pushed into a corner? The trend in Western developed nations is to encourage multi-culturalism and respect of non-White cultures and religions. Political parties in these nations have the support of a majority of the people and that is one of the reasons for an open immigration policy allowing displaced immigrants to seek refuge in their countries and settle down there.

In the process, however, the conservative segments of the population have been, at best, sidelined if not altogether ignored. Now they have begun to assert themselves. In Germany, a new far-right party — the Alternative for Germany (AfD) — was founded in 2013. In 2017, for the first time, it won 94 seats in the Bundestag. It is the largest German opposition party and opposes Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union’s (centre-right) immigration policy and is known for its euroscepticism and belief in the alleged dangers posed by Germany’s Muslim population.

France’s far-right populist party, the National Party, after suffering several defeats in general elections, has rebranded itself as the Reassemblement National Party in the hope of winning more support for its conservative agenda of national sovereignty, native inhabitants “first”, euroscepticism, and strict immigration laws. Recent polls seem to suggest that it is ahead of French president Emmanuelle Macron’s LREM Party for the EU parliament elections in May.

Across Europe and in the United States, the far right conservatives are gaining ground in elections. The conservatives put Donald Trump in the White House.

If left and liberal political parties had been more engaging of conservative voters, I wonder if Trump would have become President of the United States. Left and liberal parties tend to totally dismiss the conservative segments of voters. The result in the US was Trump as President. In Europe and Australia, the tension continues between the far right conservatives and the left and liberals.

Whatever one’s political leanings, it is a dangerous trend to ignore or dismiss segments of society just because their beliefs don’t coincide with those in power. Disenfranchised voters or citizens will find some means to express their resentment or anger or discontent. People of all walks should be engaged and find some political representation. Otherwise, they may be driven to extreme acts in order to legitimize their cause or causes.

Rebel groups and terrorists are good examples of people who resort to violence in order to assert themselves. Modern-day politics understand the value of engagement and for that reason, many governments are prepared to negotiate with rebel groups and some are even accepted into the political systems or given autonomy as in the case of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) guerrillas who became interim leaders of an autonomous Muslim region in the southern Philippines.

The only people no one should engage with are terrorists and murderers because they are motivated by hate. It doesn’t necessarily follow that engagement will prevent terrorists and murderers. But, it will improve the morale of conservative communities where hate-inspired terrorists and murderers somehow move around quite freely. Perhaps, as a result of engagement, more people will feel less hate and be less driven to hate speech and action.

Everyone else should be engaged. The chances of working amiably with people who are very different are greater when we can engage them. To do that, however, requires developing emotional skills sets so that we can reach out to them. We may not agree with them but we can reach out. That simple gesture, perhaps, is all that is needed to include people rather than exclude them and drive them to extremes.



About Gertrude

I am a little left of centre 21st Century person. What all that means you'll discover as you read my blog!
This entry was posted in The Bride and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The importance of engaging the right

  1. jonolan says:

    To your first question: Only if such engagement had started a long time ago and resulted in a situation other than what NZ had today with largely uncontrolled Muslim immigration would this not have happened.

    But… You can’t see this as other than an act of hatred. Another way to look at it was an act of patriotism and desperation love of- and fear for his own people. But that the thing about the Left; they’re all for “protected classes” acting with violence to get their way or defend their people but can’t see anyone else – i.e., straight, White, Christians – as being motivated by hate.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.